The Most Secure Election Ever Part 2

A System so Incredibly Flawed it is Impossible to Secure!

Welcome, my dear readers, to the asylum, and this week, we will talk a bit about the upcoming election.  While the talking heads say 2020 was the most secure and fair election in history, we will talk about how no election since the advent of electronic voting machines has been secure.  Of the glaring flaws in the systems, most have never been fixed. One might not be faulted for believing the holes are a feature rather than flaws.

Think about it this way: most people don’t understand how computer systems or system security work, and while awareness of online security is growing in the public perception, it primarily focuses on scammers stealing your payment card numbers, social media accounts, or some other financial and identity type of fraud. Most people believe installing a good anti-virus program, maybe a firewall, and not opening emails or messages from people they don’t know is the height of cyber security. For the average adult whose finances and personal information are of average interest to bad actors, sure, that is fine. Make it take more effort than the payoff, and you are probably good. When the average voter sees a “locked down” system that only allows access to the ballots and all the folks around watching for anything sketchy, it is easier for them to believe some lies. For example, computers don’t make mistakes, so we can be sure that all the vote tallies will be correct. Second, if we are having elections on these systems, they must be secure. Both assertions are false, but computers make fewer mistakes than people. Even if a North Carolina machine lost 4500 votes (here), so I will focus on security.

Since they first started rolling out these machines in the early 2000s, it was discovered that anyone with a thumb drive, 5 min of privacy, and evil intentions could make the machine report whatever they wanted the machine to report: these and other security issues have been known since the first election where their use was becoming more prominent in 2004 (here). Several prominent computer security experts warned of the dangers posed by electronic systems in the same early period, including a Harvard professor (here). Unfortunately, most, if not all, of these issues and others, like simple passwords and unencrypted intranet connections, haven’t been addressed (here, here, and here). Frequently, white hat hackers (professional computer security experts) test and find all the security holes they can in voting machines; however, the issues are seldom, if ever, addressed (here). Only adding insult to the injury of the insecure nature of American electronic voting is that replacement parts are often sourced from anonymous sellers on eBay, introducing the possibility of tampered ROM chips and the injection of other malware. Making U.S. voting machines some of the least secure in the world today, as in every election since their widespread use in 2012 (here and here).

This was common knowledge in 2020, yet they assured you, me, and everyone that it was the most secure election in history (here, here, and here). Saying it was the most secure in history is like saying the Titanic was the safest ship ever to sink. These officials, anchormen, and talking heads knew that the electronic voting systems were incredibly insecure and vulnerable to hacking. I am not talking about Chinese or Russian hackers in some state-sponsored hacking lair. Those are the easiest to prevent. All you have to do is air gap (any network or information system with no connection or path to connect to the internet) the voting machines' network and then physically carry the storage media containing votes to a central processing facility. That being said, it is effortless for an operative to go to vote, and using one of several methods, they could change votes cast, make it so everything looks good, but every vote cast is for their candidate no matter who is chosen on the screen, not count votes for the opposition candidate or other nefarious action. They claim these things seldom or never happen while downplaying serious irregularities with electronic voting machines, which would probably be what someone messing with the machine results would look like here, here, here, and here. These are just some examples. Officially, no matter how widespread, these were only glitches, and most have yet to be seriously investigated. However, when they are investigated, there have been convictions (here and here). Those prosecuted tend to be minor players with fringe parts, but with as full of security holes as electronic voting is, they are already talking about how insecure it is for 2024 (here). As long as their person wins, it will again be the most secure election ever, and this can be safely memory-holed. If the preferred candidate doesn’t win, they are setting up a history of stories about how easily these things can be hacked.

If more than electronic machines is needed, many jurisdictions are continuing with COVID emergency voting rules.  Things like universal mail-in ballots based on horribly inaccurate voter registrations (here, here, and here), allowing ballot harvesting that was illegal before COVID that was made legal as an emergency measure and unfortunately will stay legal in many states (here, here, and here). Finally, there will again be unattended, unmonitored, anonymous drop boxes for ballots in several states (here, here, and here). These practices make our elections less secure and much more likely to be influenced by political actors than the people's will.  The documentary 2000 Mules (I recommend you watch it.) clearly shows political activists visiting unmonitored drop boxes thousands of times in multiple states at late, odd hours (here). It isn’t a smoking gun, but it is something that really should be thoroughly investigated. The primary argument used to discredit the documentary is that phone tracking isn’t accurate enough (it is); never mind, these are the same people who wanted to use phone tracking to fine and/or jail people for violating COVID restrictions.

I honestly think the plan is to cheat on multiple fronts and hope it doesn’t seem as apparent with the wrong candidate winning and all the crucial places ceasing vote counts all at once (many think it was to figure out exactly how many votes they needed) only to be flipped first thing in the morning suddenly. Remember when Hillary Clinton said Biden should not concede on election night no matter what it looks like in the lead-up to 2020 (here)? It makes one wonder if she was privy to non-public information about how they planned to win.

The cherry on the cake is you have Democrats in Washington saying even if Trump wins, they will not certify the election (here and here). Think about this: the Democrats have denied every Republican presidential election since 2000 (here), and they are already reporting how insecure our electronic voting systems are. So, what happens if Trump does win? We have seen groups like Burn Loot Murder and Antifa burn cities, loot stores, and kill anyone even suspected not to be one of them over rapists, thieves, and other criminals. Will the drums of electronic hacking begin beating with job postings for riots funded by Soros to spread terror and burn major cities to the ground (here)?  It would follow the rules for radicals by Mr. Alinsky. Make them scared to oppose you. So, it is possible.

The other side is what would happen if Trump lost?  Especially if he wins until they close the polls and suddenly loses again, or any other inconsistencies might occur. After four years of watching corrupt federal and state law enforcement agencies wage political lawfare on Trump, he survives a very suspicious assassination attempt, and the majority believe that he was cheated in 2020. Do you think they will take it this time? I don’t think they will, and while I pray for another peaceful power transition, I honestly don’t think it will happen. The establishment (Democrats currently) will stop at nothing to maintain power so they can continue to advance the plans of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), moving us towards Central Bank Digital Currencies, the 4th Industrial Revolution, and Project 2030. We are seeing a taste, call it a teaser trailer, in the United Kingdom with people arrested for speech, including flying the flag of the United Kingdom (here). At the same time, migrants make parts of English cities criminal hellscapes and no-go zones (here), and citizens are arrested for offending illegal migrants. In contrast, migrants receive no jail time for murder, fighting with police, and child rape (here, here, here, and here). Yes, if your speech is offensive or inciting (the government decides what offensive or inciting means), you go to prison. If you are a migrant that rapes children, you go free.  It is so bad that English and European officials have threatened to attempt extradition of U.S. citizens for exercising free speech in America (here) or to arrest Elon Musk for interviewing a presidential candidate (here). Sadly, that is precisely what the establishment Democrats and Republicans want for you, me, and our children. It is also the preview to the totalitarian nightmare being pushed by the NGOs with Project 2030, the 4^th Industrial Revolution, and all their other insane policies.

The bottom line is that I don’t think it is possible to have an open, fair, or free election in America anymore. The establishment has been working too long, while the majority has been asleep at perfecting a murky system that is almost impossible to trace or secure. Be ready. We may not be voting ourselves out of this one. Be in your safe space from election night until you know what will happen and can plan your next move.

Galatians 5:13-14

13 For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. 14 For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

God Bless you

-Sam