The Fall of an Empire

They are Going to Do it... Wrap-up (Part 4 Kind of)

Welcome once again into the Asylum, my friends.  This week we are going to look closely at the fraying fabric of Western Civilization and society.  This is a follow up, an unofficial Part 4 to my three-part series at the end of the year. If you haven’t yet, please read that series first, as it will give context and background information (here, here, and here).  I feel the need to do this because I ended Part 3 in a rush due to length and time constraints. 

You are seeing the intentional destruction of the western world order.  I think this is partly to cover for the institutional lies since 1913 and partly because some very powerful people want to land on their feet at the expense of everyone else.  That being said, I don’t think we have a generations-long plan coming to fruition, but more a group of well-positioned global elites that see the results of all the “good ideas” with the “best of intentions” over the last 110 years and decided it was better to try and cause and control the collapse than to just be a part of it when it occurred.  It doesn’t really matter in the greater scheme of things. However, the desired results are similar.

For me, one of the key indicators that our current situation is staged is how readily the mainstream media (MSM) is trying to force the idea of global social collapse into the narrative and make it the new fear driver for the common folk (here,

here, and here).  Forbes, Fortune, Yahoo, and many others have been running stories priming the pump, as it were, and laying a foundation of news to refer to when it is needed in a few months.  They are essentially putting a bug in the public ear.

This bug is, of course, to make sure as many people as possible are primed to be driven to hysterical fear when the economic unraveling we are just starting to see really gets into full swing later this year.  As we discovered with COVID, scared people just want to be saved no matter the cost.  While left to its own devices, the United States (US) economy and the US Dollar are in a death spiral with few possible outcomes:

1.      Do what is needed to save the Dollar (Jack up interest rates far beyond the planned 5-5.5%) and destroy the various Markets (all now built on debt, not equity).

2.      Do what is needed to save the various Markets (open the money creation spigot) and destroy the Dollar.

3.      Tighten monetary policy some and increase interest rates a little, trying to get things to level out. Ultimately resulting in a slow death spiral of inflation and sliding markets (what we have now).

The folks at the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and various other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) know this.  They have known this since the first Davos conference in 1971 where Schwab started his public machinations towards his vison of stakeholder capitalism (here and here). An attendee at the first meeting was JK Galbraith, an American economist and opponent of traditional capitalism advocating in the early 70s for open socialism (here, here, and here).  On August 15th, 1971 Nixon made the US Dollar a fully fiat currency by removing its last restraining tethers to gold (here), a curious coincidence and one JK Galbraith praised Nixon for (here).  It is clear even if the change in the Dollar’s status was coincidental that these people have been working toward the goal of global communism, couched in stakeholder capitalism, where a disinterested manager will balance the needs of all stakeholders from employees, suppliers, customers, the environment, society and others to the benefit of all and detriment of none (here).  It seriously is just a repackaging of Marx’s “From each according to ability; To each according to need,” with a better marketing firm.

While I know a lot of people like to blame various tragic events, both economic and human, on various NGOs, I think that the number of events attributed to them gives more credit than is due.  While I am sure they are behind some of it to advance their own goals, I think it is most likely that these organizations are probably just really good at capitalizing on these events to move their agenda and since they do continually make strides in the face of tragedy, people assume the tragedy was planned, where in most cases I think it was just planned for.  When these organizations take direct action, it is usually technically legal but skeezy and shady as hell.  A good example of this is George Soros and all the shares he purchased in various District Attorneys (DAs) (here, here, here, and here).  If the goal is more crime, instability, and the feeling of unequal justice, there is no need to break the law.  All you have to do is fund DAs that will turn rapists, murderers, and thieves back loose on the streets, while prosecuting to the fullest any parent that dares to speak up at a school board meeting because school policies got his daughter raped (here, here, and here ).  The thing is, they know emergencies like pandemics, terrorist attacks, earth quakes, floods, and a list of other things.  Since the NGOs know that these things happen, they can make plans and contingencies to capitalize on them.

That capitalization on what they see as an opportunity is why I think they are so often accused of orchestrating events.  The WEF response to the COVID pandemic is an absolute text book case.  As the pandemic panic was fanned into flames globally by politicians backed by various WEF members, like Bill gates and George Soros, the head Bond-villain Klaus Schwab released a book and announced in June that normal economic and governance systems were outdated and could not manage the demands of the pandemic and it was time for a Great Reset (to Stakeholder Capitalism) (here).  Then, for the next 18 months, Schwab and other WEF members pushed hard for massive changes to social and economic structures around the world (here, here, and here). It was seen and touted as a chance to get UN Agenda 2030 back on track (here).  This capitalization of events isn’t new for the WEF. They have been doing it to one extent or another since the 1970s (here, here, and here).

The WEF isn’t the only NGO trying to adjust the world to their vison of the future, but they are currently the most successful, and this is because of their partnerships (here).  This has accelerated since 1993 with their Young Global Leaders program.  Essentially, if you are a new innovator (the founders of Google and Facebook are somewhat recent members of the program) you get offered a spot in the program and the benefit of WEF’s influence going forward (here and here).  Seriously, being offered success for you and whatever you stand for in exchange for what seems like little at first, couched in pleasant language, who wouldn’t accept?  Then, like all grooming, a little at a time you are in and your only perceived option is to stay in and go along. It is this way that over the last 52 years the WEF has expanded and become so successful.  They have then used that success to place members in all stages of governmental regulatory agencies and even elected office, and have fostered the public-private revolving door seen in all American regulatory agencies like the FDA (here).  In this way they grow in power and influence and have captured several other NGOs by cross-pollinating members.

The real problem is how WEF and the UN see the 4th industrial revolution panning out.  Mr. Schwab wrote an entire book on the subject where he states that with the rise of artificial intelligence and robotic workforces there will be surplus people with no possibility of employment that governments won’t be able to provide for properly.  While the book doesn’t come out and say population reduction, it does talk an awful lot about subjects directly adjacent to that.  The book does say there must be a smaller population for the good of the planet (here).  Note, this book was published in 2016 in conjunction and support of the UN’s 2015 launch of the entire Agenda 2030 mess.  There are arguments to be made that Gates, Schwab, and the rest intend to reach population goals by means of raising people out of poverty and into industrialization, to reduce birth rates and see the population decline organically.  Unfortunately, as we have seen with the poster-child for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) capitalism in Sri Lanka, it isn’t possible and leads to starvation and strife (here and here).  That isn’t a surprise, as ESG is just a measure of how socialist, woke, and green you are as an organization, three ideologies that are not known to be successful at anything except promoting poverty, hate, and death.  It is clear that even if the NGOs could get birth rates down, it won’t be with the current incarnation of ESG or in time for the deadline set of 2030.

The question is, how do they get to the world foretold in Forbes magazine back in 2016 (here) and re-touched by Schwab’s “You will own nothing and be happy” proclamation (here and here), and the US isn’t the leading super power.? Oh... That one was buried in the muck, wasn’t it?  That has to happen because of all the world’s countries the US government has the least amount of internal power and the states are entirely too independent.  We saw that with COVID, where states like California, New York, and Illinois went full Chinese authoritarian, in line with most of the rest of the world and the edict coming from the WEF, while states like Florida, South Dakota, and Texas did very little to nothing.  To make matters worse, as the dust settles and the data comes in, the picture is clear and trampling of people’s rights did absolutely nothing to save lives (here) and possibly just prolonged the pandemic.  In other countries, if the central governments are essentially captured by introducing industry experts into regulatory positions or business people to elected office that are members of your NGO, when you get enough of them in high enough places the government then acts on behalf of your NGO.  From America, you can see this in the fact that laws with massive public support rarely get passed, or around 23% of the time, but laws with massive NGO/elite support do pass over 86% of the time and 74% when opposed massively by the public (here and here).  The NGOs have essentially made Washington government of for and by the NGO, as they have in every other country of the world.

Fortunately, America is different in that it was never intended to have a strong federal government and was founded more like the European Union as an association of sovereign countries than a single entity.  I realize that has been greatly undermined in the 234 years since the Constitution’s ratification, especially in the 14th amendment that created the US citizen and applied the constitution to all the states (here) (but that is a topic for another paper).  This situation poses a huge problem for NGO plans, as many US states that don’t play ball are as large, populous, and economically powerful as most European nations.  Another problem is America’s people have a lot of guns. So many that estimates range from 300 million to over 600 million, but no one really knows because there was no requirement for serialization before the 1960s and until the 90s you could just go in, pay, and leave with a firearm.  So, there is a huge period of history with no way to actually gauge what the public obtained.  The only options are to make America irrelevant or destroy her. 

America has enough self-inflicted wounds that the NGOs do have a place to attack and on several fronts.  Financially, various elites seeking their own power and prestige have gutted our economy to the point it is a house of cards standing on held breath and faith. Essentially, the constitution says congress could coin money, set the value of the money, and regulate banks.  In 1913, some bankers convinced congress it would be a good idea to let them coin the money, set its value, and regulate banks.  After that, gold was still money but if banks joined up with the new Federal Reserve Bank (FED) they could use fraud… um, fractional reserve banking and if they ever ran out of money the FED would just loan them some more until deposits came in.  This caused some inflation and made the first round of bankers extremely wealthy.  By the later 1920s, it was clear many small-town independent banks were not interested in joining the FED system, and either like the idea of fractional reserve banking (that was now legal) or they couldn’t compete with FED banks unless they moved to that system.  To deal with the hold outs, the FED jacked up rates and crashed the system in 1929 (here).  This resulted in folks not trusting the system and wanting their money back. Unfortunately, due to banks using fractional reserves, that wasn’t always possible, resulting in banks collapsing and doing away with non-FED banks.  This also lead to the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) that now guaranteed all the fractionally reserved accounts.  As we know, the events of 1929 lead to The Great Depression and the New Deal that perpetuated the depression until after WWII.  During that period, Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) outlawed the private ownership of gold (essentially said folks couldn’t own money any more) and forced everyone to sell their gold to the government for $20 an ounce, greatly increasing the government’s reserves of gold.  As soon as the program was complete, and the government had just collected all the gold for $20 an ounce, FDR inflated the price of gold to $35 an ounce, allowing his government to print and spend $15 for every ounce collected and devalued the paper they just handed out by 75% over night.  This was used to pay for government programs like the new federal Ponzi scheme called Social Security.  Then, at the end of WWII, Europe was broke, devastated, and didn’t have the gold or silver resources to make more money.  At this point, the American Dollar was still backed and constrained by gold. So, a deal was struck called the Brentwood Agreement.  This agreement basicallty said since the US wasn’t decimated and the Dollar was still representative of gold, European nations could hold Dollars instead of gold or silver to back their currencies and help rebuild.  This made the US Dollar the world’s reserve currency.  However, this only lasted 27 years because of America’s constant waring in Korea and Vietnam, coupled with the Great Society Welfare programs of 1964. The US was spending much more money than it was bringing in and as a result many nations were calling in their bonds and expecting to receive gold in exchange.  Rather than deplete the US gold reserves, cut spending, or seek a sensible solution, Richard Nixon unilaterally broke the final thread that connected the US Dollar to gold and decided the US would no longer honor its bonds with gold but with US currency, making our monetary system fully fiat and allowing the US to become the world’s most in debt nation, as well as all of the financial acrobatics on Wall Street that leverage every dollar into several hundred without producing any actual value.  I cover all of this with sources in depth here and here.

That brings us to now and the only real vestige of value left for the US Dollar is the fact that it is the medium of exchange on international petroleum markets.  This reliance on the Petrodollar is currently the last peg holding up the house of paper bills built on a foundation of bonds.  China, the WEFs chosen champion to take down the US economically, has set itself up to do just that by establishing a trade network of 165 nations, establishing mechanisms for international trade totally separate from any of the Western establishment like World Bank or the International Monetary Fund.  Now, they are taking a huge swipe at the US by courting OPEC and openly advocating for them to abandon the Petrodollar in favor of the Petroyuan as recently as 12/2022 (here and here).  China is couching the entire trade organization in claims that they won’t meddle in the internal affairs of members like the US and that the trade yuan, including the Petroyuan, will be gold backed (here, here, and here).  I think it is a miscalculation for the NGOs to try and use China because I don’t think they will have the influence they want, but I do think their plans for the European Union being their anti-American champion failed and they see little alternative.

If you haven’t gotten it yet, I think that OPEC will switch trade currencies, cutting the last support from under the dollar, creating a rush of nations around the world to dump the now completely useless dollar as quickly possible to get as much as they can back from the holdings, with those who are late left holding the bag on massive losses.  This will destroy the American economy and drive domestic inflation to levels not seen since Zimbabwe or post-Weimar Germany, permanently ending US economic dominion of the world.  It will also make The Great Depression look like massive levels of prosperity, while simultaneously being used to reset US currency to Central Bank digital money, since the fiat dollar will be dead (here and here).

The second prong of the assault on America is the social fabric and we see it in the controlled media, unequal protection under the law, attack on masculinity, and the depravity that passes as virtue to our children.  I am over 3000 words and have written extensively about these things (here, here, here, here, and all over the SubStack here).

It is ugly and it is coming. The enemy has been planning this for a long time and been publicly espousing it since 2009.  Next week will be different and I will tell you how we can fight and how we can prepare.  Full hope for the best, prepare for the worst, and take what comes.

Luke 21:36

36 But stay awake at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that are going to take place, and to stand before the Son of Man.”

God Bless you,

-Sam