Welcome, my dear readers, once again to the asylum. This week is different, as I am not going to paywall this post for 90 days and make it available to everyone instantly. After you read it, I encourage you to share it because I think it provides a framework to help people understand what we are seeing in the world today, or at least provides something to think about. For many years now, I have had an uneasy feeling about the world in general and the direction of our country in particular. When I say a few years, we are talking since the late 1990s. The way things happened in the United States and around the world. At the same time, we could see the attempts here; the states’ distributed nature of our governmental authority, constitutional guarantees, the traditions of defiance that are baked into our bones, and our massive size have hindered the overall progress of tyranny. I say hindered, not stopped. If we look anywhere in the European Union, Canada, or the United Kingdom, we can see the results of the plans laid by the United Nations and World Economic Forum. Their only option is to shoot their way out at this point. Europe and Canada are beyond a peaceful resolution if their people want to be free. This isn’t to say there isn’t resistance. There are protests, and in England particularly there are a group called the blade runners destroying cameras that issue the fines for exceeding 15 minutes from your home (here, here, and here). Unfortunately, many Europeans are so institutionalized to state power their protests demand more state control by way of social programs. In the end, all those populations are unarmed and as such will ultimately be ineffective (here and here).
Across Europe and in Canada people are arrested for the most trivial MEMEs in opposition to the approved narrative, for flying their own flag in their own country, and children are arrested for resisting rape by migrants. All this while migrant criminals go unpunished, people are fined for driving too far away from their homes, and are offered suicide rather than medicine when they are sick. The people of Europe are forced to watch comedians get jailed for jokes. Freedom is dead in Europe and Canada. The governmental framework for Agenda 2030 and the 4th industrial revolution are fully in place. They will own nothing and be “happy” or at least too afraid to say they are not (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).
To ensure their grasp of power and the suppression of native Germans, the government has started hiring migrants as police and most of them can’t speak German (here). These police will be much more likely to do whatever it takes to beat the people into submission than will native born Germans. It is very similar here with the Biden era program to recruit illegal aliens into the United States Military (here) with the same intention. Please note that the framework for all these horrific demonic polices we see in Europe has already been codified into law here in the states. Just to this point, they haven’t had sufficient state support to fully deploy them.
Before you read any further, go read this (here) because I don’t want to hear they wouldn’t because whatever it is. The government already has and worse. I have said it before I don’t think we are seeing the results of a generational plan for domination, but I do think we are seeing the cumulative result of generations of influential people buying laws\rules that enrich themselves with money and\or power independently. These plans like the Federal Reserve, various regulations (and their beneficial loopholes), and laws have had a cumulative effect. I think the real push for control started in the 1970s with the end of Bretton Woods and the rise of the World Economic Forum (WEF). They happened in the same year (here and here). I find this interesting if nothing else. The 1970s were also the birth of climate hysteria, the primary justification for subjugation, even if it needs to be punctuated by the occasional terrorist attack. In the beginning, global cooling was to fear and “scientists” wanted vast sums of money to build massive CO2 generators, it turned to Global Warming by the 1980s, and Climate Change, the ultimate amorphous bogyman, by the early 2000s (here).
This has been used to shut down entire industries in Europe and the United States, but only there. What really happened is we off-shored our pollution and rather than deal with a slight amount of pollution modern high-tech facilities put out, we allow primitive under-developed countries to spew massive amounts of pollution because we are “green” (here and here). These regulations allowed companies to significantly reduce the cost of regulatory compliance, if not production. I say this because transporting product from its place of manufacture in developing or semi-industrialized nations to markets in North America and Europe cuts into any savings derived from cheaper labor. The real savings comes from not having to comply with worker safety or environmental regulatory expenses that must be followed in the developed world. For larger products that face tariffs, other regulation, or have minimal environmental impact in their final stages, like many cars, final assembly was left in the developed world and the majority of workers were replaced by robots and other automation, cutting down on both labor expenses and regulatory compliance costs.
At some point in the middle 1990s, as these companies were making massive profits realizing the fruit of global environmental fear, that fear started to wane as more and more of the dire predictions failed to come to fruition, and the people of the developed world started to notice they were getting worse off by the year. A new bogyman was needed. If it was a happy coincidence for the “Elite Class”, or something else, 09/11/2001 gave them a new monster to scare the prolls into obedience. While I won’t say 9/11 was an inside job, I do think there are a lot of suspicious happenings surrounding the event, and if the official government explanation is true, I don’t understand why so much of the evidence and investigation is still classified. I don’t know what happened, but I don’t think the official report is true either. I don’t need to know the truth about 09/11/2001 to know what the results of that event were. We were told they “HATE us for our Freedom” repeatedly and on blast by the state-run mainstream media (MSM). If that was the case, then we let them win a near total victory a little more than a month later when the USA PATRIOT Act (one of the least accurately named pieces of legislation to date) was signed into law on October 26th 2001.
This bill was supposed to be the ultimate weapon against terrorists, yet it allowed unprecedented abuses of American citizens without due process. This bill allowed among other things (here, here, and here):
Section 215:
Allowed the FBI to obtain secret court orders for "tangible things" like driver's licenses, credit records, and internet history without a warrant based on “probable cause”. We all know what kind of flimsy nothing evidence was needed for these secret kangaroo courts to issue warrants. Most notably, one of these warrants was the basis for the Trump Russia hoax.
Enabled the FBI to demand various records, including phone, bank, and internet data, from businesses without a court order, effectively creating secret, court-approved records requests.
Prohibited librarians and other record holders from disclosing that they had been compelled to provide records under Section 215.
Section 411:
Allows the government to exclude non-citizens who used their position to endorse or espouse terrorist activity, potentially chilling legitimate speech by Americans.
Due Process was destroyed with provisions, like the ability to conduct secret "sneak and peek" searches. This evidence couldn’t be used in court, but could be used as probable cause to get a warrant. Horribly eroding Fourth Amendment protections, which require probable cause for any search.
The law granted sweeping powers to law enforcement and intelligence agencies, allowing access to sensitive personal information, which critics argued treated ordinary citizens as suspects.
This horrendous law was then followed by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 on 11/05/2022. That expanded the abuses of the Patriot Act by (here, here, and here):
Erosion of privacy and civil liberties:
Expansion of government surveillance: Title II of the HSA supported the Total Information Awareness (TIA) program, which sought to collect and analyze vast amounts of data that enabled broad-scale government surveillance and severely infringed on personal privacy. The Hero Edward Snowden is still in exile for showing us that the government was collecting copies of all of our electronic communications.
Creation of Fusion Centers: The Act encouraged the establishment of over 70 "fusion centers," where federal, state, and local agencies could share information. These centers exist for gathering intelligence on Americans and for monitoring lawful political activities.
This bill allows for unconstrained monitoring of entire communities of people based on any number of possible connections including but not limited to religion, race, apparent friends group.
Reduced government transparency and oversight:
New information disclosure exemption: The Act created a new category of information, "critical infrastructure information," that is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This prevented public awareness of the fusion centers under the guise of protecting power lines, and other infrastructure.
Criminalization of unauthorized disclosure: The HSA made it a criminal offense for federal employees to "knowingly" disclose critical infrastructure information without proper authorization. This provision was widely seen as a "gag order" that could prevent whistleblowers from revealing government misconduct.
Liability protections for corporations:
Immunity for anti-terrorism technology sellers: The Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies (SAFETY) Act, passed as part of the HSA, provides liability protection to sellers of "qualified anti-terrorism technologies". We can’t have the fascinators of the police state sued out of existence even when their technology is misused.
Consolidation of immigration functions:
Overhaul of immigration services: The HSA disbanded the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and transferred its functions to the new DHS, merging immigration services with enforcement and border security under a single department. This consolidation led to a dramatic expansion of funding and authority for immigration enforcement and removals. This also made it much easier for the Biden Administration to shut down enforcement and tracking of the flood of illegal migrants than it would have otherwise been.
After this, we got the Real ID act in 2005. This law established a traceable national identification designed to allow the tracking of all your financial, travel, and communications activity (here, here, and here). The states did an excellent job resisting, even through the lies of national and local news. As of 2015, ten years after the law was passed, there were still 28 states that refused to fall in line and produce a traceable national identification (here). Prior to this the deadline was extended over and over because it was impossible to enforce flight prohibitions, and the entering of federal buildings based on Real ID, when most of the country was non-compliant and resisting. However, at this time there was a media blitz designed to instill fear by acting like people wouldn’t be able to fly or go into federal buildings after the deadline, without pointing out that over half the country was not complying (here). While some states now offer a regular driver’s license or a Real ID drivers license (I have a regular and will never have a real ID one) at this time all states now offer a Real ID compliant identification, allowing for your face and other biometric information to be uploaded for facial recognition cameras and tracking. The last extension to the law expired on May 7th 2025, after the states gave up the fight 20 years after the original law (here).
Then in 2006, we got the Military Commissions Act (MCA), a particularly egregious piece of legislation. This provided the means of enforcement for previously legal things discovered by way of the Patriot Act or the Homeland Security Act that wasn’t possible before such as (here, here, and here):
Broad Definition of "Unlawful Enemy Combatant":
The act created an overly broad definition of "unlawful enemy combatant," potentially subjecting any civilian who provided some level of support to an armed group to military detention and trial, even far from any battlefield. This included donating to charities that donated money to terrorist organizations unbeknownst to the contributor. All it takes is for the president to declare a group terrorists and then if you donated to them, even unknowingly, now you are an enemy combatant. It is left field, but the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) is listed as a terrorist organization and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) isn’t (should be). PETA donates money to ELF (here). Anyone who donated to a PETA funds drive that then gave money to ALF is subject to being declared an enemy combatant. They haven’t used it widely yet, but they could.
Fair Trial Concerns:
The military commissions established under the act do not adhere to the fair trial provisions required by the United States Constitution, international human rights laws, and the Geneva Conventions.
Limited Discovery and Evidence:
The act allowed the withholding of classified information, making it extremely difficult for a defendant's counsel to challenge evidence and build an effective defense. If you want to hide exculpatory evidence, this lets you, as it is secret or for national security. Ultimately allowing only for prosecution and no real defense.
Use of Coercive Statements:
While prohibiting statements obtained through torture, concerns were raised that the MCA permitted the use of statements obtained through coercion and that the process for proving a statement was coerced was inadequate. Please note, most standard torture was also reclassified as enhanced interrogation including sleep deprivation, water boarding, and stress positions among other worse things (here and here).
Command Influence:
The MCA did not provide sufficient protections against "command influence," where military leaders could improperly pressure proceedings to reach a desired outcome.
Differing Standards for Non-Citizens:
The Act set lower due process standards for non-citizens compared to U.S. citizens.
Suspension of Habeas Corpus:
Once anyone is declared an enemy combatant (this is an executive declaration), the MCA attempted to strip away the right to habeas corpus, which allows individuals to challenge the legality of their detention. To make matters worse, once declared an enemy combatant because you donated $5 to a girl selling cookies for PETA, you can be whisked away to secret prisons, tortured, or even executed with no due process. While they were probably bad people (we won’t know. There was no trial.), the MCA is how Obama justified executing American citizens by drone. So, the precedent is already established (here).
If we were really hated for our freedom, then by 2006 they shouldn’t have hated us anymore. The framework for total control was in place. The government could monitor everything you did, criminalize anything it wanted to, and then torture you until you confessed or just murder you because it was easier. While the provisions enabling torture, confinement, and death haven’t been widely adopted yet, they have been used. American citizens Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki (a 16 year old kid) and his dad before that (here) were executed without trial, and many January 6th protestors were held without bail in sub-human conditions for years on misdemeanor charges due to these laws (here).
So far, mostly these laws have been used by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI to stage false terrorist threats and arrest dupes (here). I do think the only reason they haven’t been more aggressive with these laws, that essentially erase the constitution, is because there is some fear that the military won’t go along with widespread enforcement and the population has far far too many guns. So, they need an emergency so horrific that even some of the most stalwart bend the knee. Widespread civil unrest is the beginning. After Emperor Bush, second of his name, dodger of drafts, doer of cocaine, menace of the middle east, we got Obama, the drone king, divider of races. One might think ‘Cool. We elected a black guy president. The dream of a color-blind America is finally here.’ Nope. The great divider introduced us to systemic racism and ushered in the age of intersectionality. This all eventually emerged as the WOKE culture of the twenty teens (here, here, here, and here). Obama tested on the fringes the new powers bestowed on America to “fight” the war on terror just on the edges, killing US citizens, using government power to monitor and suppress opposition (here and here). His greatest accomplishment was undoing 50 years of improvement in race relations and laying the framework for the race riots, child gender mutilation, and flood of aberrant sexual content in every media space including grade school libraries.
Just to make sure you are following along, climate fear was used to drive policies to enrich the few while weakening the middle class, making them more dependent and outsource our pollution. Then, the government used terrorism or the threat thereof to implement a series of laws that enable total police-state control. Please note, George W Bush and his father are tightly entwined with the WEF as well as the trilateral commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (here, here, here, and here), all entities that have espoused similar views on depopulation, socialism rebranded as Stakeholder Capitalism, and expansions of government power. It may be a conspiracy, but I do find it odd that someone who has lived their entire life pushing for global polices and top-down models of control suddenly passes a bunch of laws that give the government that power. It is interesting to note in recent history who were members of the CFR before being elected president (here):
Richard Nixon
Gerald Ford
Jimmy Carter
George H. W. Bush
Bill Clinton
George W. Bush
Barack Obama
Joe Biden
Notice a pattern to modern elections? Going back to its founding, more CFR members were president than non-members, and often both mainstream candidates were members. I do think it is interesting that at the time of the 2016 election Hillary Clinton was a member of the CFR (still is) and Trump wasn’t (still isn’t). I think Trump, who Clinton actually helped win the nomination because she thought he would be an easy opponent (here), I think she was supposed to move the plan forward the next step. I am not sure how, but a false flag with a compliant media seems to be a popular method of operation for our government (here). Remember the news reporting leading up to the election with 80- or 90-point leads for Clinton. The election was just a formality. I think she was intended to use the division and policy framework to bring America home (so we could be like Europe: disarmed, jailed for memes, and under the boot). Do you remember the shock of that upset? The wailing and gnashing of teeth. I didn’t vote for him as I didn’t trust him (still don’t) but it was clear he wasn’t the plan. So what do you do when plan A doesn’t work? You go to plan B, and Trump went from being just another rich guy who palled around with the elite (Clintons included), with Donald going so far as to defend Clinton during the Lewinski scandal (here and here), to being literally Hitler, the most racist, fascist, evil man that ever lived. The media ran with it (here). The entire time we had elected officials calling for violence against conservatives, and emphasizing imagined slights, driving division (here and here). The lies were so transparent that CNN essentially destroyed itself (here). Then, we got COVID. Was it intended to be the vessel for Hillary to advance the agenda? I don’t know, but I do know that while Trump went along in the beginning, very quickly he refused to use Federal authority to force sates to comply with anything (here and here). This was used to ferment more division among the American people while they lied and spun, turning COVID into the killer-plague it was not, going so far as to falsify death records to push the narrative (here, here, here, and here). All through the COVID experience it becomes rapidly clear who will and who will not comply with the nonsense and the divisions essentially across liberal and conservative lines. With California, New York, Illinois, and other blue states going full totalitarian dictatorship and Florida, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, and other red states being over the entire thing and getting back to normal after just a few months.
Then, after the sketchiest election in American history, we have the CFR back in the White House and we get mandates, discharged service members, and unemployed nurses, all for a vaccine that doesn’t work and can kill you. Whoever is running things (it wasn’t Biden) continues to spread fear and tries to bring back all the climate hysteria. They do this because they NEED the division and the hate. All over they talk about non-existent genocide, and oppression that hasn’t happened and won’t because it is completely made up. To the point the least stable are either rendered disabled by fear or they become violent.
COVID became a test and it showed America wasn’t ready. So, to have the people gladly accept the same kind of controls we see running rampant in Europe and Canada they need more conflict. They learned with MK Ultra (it is absolutely a real thing) (here) how to push the unstable towards violence and how to direct that violence both in general and specifically. What we have seen with all the fear and rhetoric since at least 2016 is a push towards violence of a political nature. This push is reaching critical mass among the least stable. We see it in a Catholic school shooting and the death of Charlie Kirk. How long will it be before the least stable on the other side sees weekly, biweekly, or monthly shooting of conservatives by leftists before they go View hunting, or tracking CNN personalities in the wild? It doesn’t take many, just 1-2% on the fringes of either side and we have a few dozen assassinations or attacks a week. It spirals from there. I don’t think they want state actors. They just want blood in the streets and an ever-escalating problem. Once it spills over to even the normal folks having to shoot it out with the crazies over a bumper sticker or hat. This will set the stage for European-style population controls and full enforcement of the laws they put in place 20 years ago. If you don’t think this is where we are going or what is happening, I hope you are correct, but I don’t think you are. Meet the crazy with truth in kindness and walk boldly in the truth of Christ. It is all we can do, and if enough of us do, we can maybe de-escalate this ever-growing problem.
Matthew 5:9
9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.
God bless you!
-Sam