No more lies, No more compliance

Hello my Readers,

The beautiful thing about bureaucracy is often one hand doesn’t know what the other is doing and office drones turn out reports that perhaps their higher ups wouldn’t want the public to see, but get publicly published anyway.  Since real investigative journalism is dead in the mainstream media, there is little risk that this information, buried deep in FDA and CDC websites, will ever see the light of day.  Today, I will present examples of public documents that cast doubt on the entire narrative.  Let me direct your attention first to an FDA paper on the COVID In-Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) used in tests to determine if you are infected with COVID or not.  It seems that the panels that were approved for use in Feb 2020 not only were not standardized, they all also used contrived COVID virus samples (here).  The tests did not contain an actual real world confirmed COVID sample, and they all used different guesses as to what the virus might actually look like. 

This could explain all the “conspiracy theory” reports associated with testing throughout 2020 that were denied or downplayed by the mainstream media (MSM), where a person would get conflicting test results from tests run on the same day at different facilities (here).  If people were getting test with divergent contrived samples it makes since that they could get different results.  If you read through the paper in its entirety, you will see that the FDA is still approving a test using a contrived sample (since words still do mean things and they use the word contrived a lot in this paper, here is the definition of contrived (here, here, and here). It is just the same contrived sample across the board (here).  It looks like they only had some RNA fragments that they believed or claimed to believe came from COVID.  The powers that be then had smart virus doctors contrive what they thought it would be if complete.  This resulted in several different contrived COVID viruses for use in testing and it looks like they used them all, or at least several of them.  We don’t actually know how many total were contrived or how many different ones were used in tests. We only know that they were contrived and they used several, per their own documentation.  Now, they are moving forward with one test to rule them all that also uses a contrived sample of the COVID virus.  How did they determine the correct contrived sample to use?  Did they pick the one with the most positive results, the least, or one that maintained a consistent ratio of both?  Did the test results have anything to do with the selection?  I can’t find it on either the CDC‘s or FDA’s web sites. So, we might never know or O might stumble across it tomorrow.

Interestingly, the Bulgarian Pathology Association states that there has never been an isolated and purified sample of the COVID-19 virus, and the use of contrived samples render current PCR tests meaningless (here).  In fact, even the New York Times (NYT) reported that up to 90% of positive COVID tests could be false (They did it in low distribution, not front page kind of way here and it was reported on here and here).  I also found some “debunking” articles that say ‘No, the NYT didn’t say the tests were inaccurate.  They said they were too accurate and picked up people who didn’t need to quarantine or have any treatment’ (here).  The stupid in the fact check hurts.  If a test says you are sick, sends you home to quarantine, and recommends additional treatment when you are not sick and don’t need quarantine or treatment, then the test is wrong.  I would say with the political nature of COVID, false-positives are as bad as false negatives.  The problem, as the NYT points out, is the PCR test was run incorrectly to higher than 25-30 cycles (CT), where the test becomes hyper sensitive and detects very minor traces that do not in fact indicate infection.  The NYT article reported that CTs above 34 almost never detect live virus but most often, dead nucleotides that are not contagious.  I find it interesting that earlier this year the CDC also recommended that the threshold of PCR testing be reduced for vaccinated people to 28 cycles, but still recommended the higher cycle rate, that the NYT points out results in a lot of false positives, for everyone else.  The original document was posted here but has since been removed and now has a redirect to send you to an unrelated page.  Thankfully, it can still be viewed thanks to the Way back Machine internet archive here.  Also, the Atlantic presents proof that around 50% of COVID patients in the hospital are not in the hospital for COVID.  Example: a patient is in the hospital for surgery with no symptoms or indication of COVID, but tests positive on the mandatory hospital COVID test.  That patient, who is in the hospital WITH COVID is now marked the same as people in the hospital FOR COVID, leading to inflated COVID hospitalization numbers by around 50% (here).

Prior to the election, many prominent people said they absolutely wouldn’t trust the TRUMP vaccines (here, here, here, and here for some examples).  The vaccines are the same as the TRUMP vaccines. The scientists involved are the same. So, why trust it now?  In the NYT article, it appears that the guidance for test cycles was set too high and the CDC probably knew it.  I find it odd the CDC sent the guidance out to cut the cycles by almost half for vaccinated people shortly after the election.  Would officials at the CDC have lowered the testing cycles on the PCR if Biden had lost?  Let’s face it, our current crop of elected officials were all opposed to any Trump vaccine and now are trying to force the exact same vaccine on everyone, even if you don’t want it.  It seems to me that they had plans to rig the system. Since PCR tests at super high cycles produce false positives at rates of up to 90%, under the old guidance it could have gone on forever, and it would have looked like “Trump’s” vaccines were garbage.  Over the last several years, we have seen countless examples of Washington insiders intentionally doing the wrong things just to mess with Trump, knowing their narratives were not true.  Most recently, look at General Milley. He essentially committed treason and colluded with our enemies because he didn’t like the duly-elected president (here, here, and here).  Then, there are all the FBI agents who knowingly lied to keep the Russian Hoax alive and to arrange spying on a presidential candidate (here, here, here and here).  When people talk about the ‘Deep State’, it is these unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats that frequently break the law, lie, cheat, and steal so that they can gain more power and control.  After all the non-sense during the Trump years, no rational person can honestly say there isn’t a Deep State or deny that it works for its own agenda. The people, the constitution, and all else be damned. 

At this point, I am fully COVID-agnostic.  I don’t know what the truth is or if COVID is really a thing.  What I do know is that neither the Government or the media are being honest with us.  At first, the message was: there is no way that it came from a lab, this is a natural virus. Now, there is little possibility it didn’t come from a lab. However, since the Chinese government has declared it naturally occurring and has threatened sanctions or military action over even the suggestion it escaped from their lab, we will probably never have the opportunity to know the truth.  For me personally, the Chinese defensiveness on the lab leak tends to help convince me that is the origin.  Further, all the evidence points to the fact Dr. Fauci (Dr. Dredd?  I am the science [here]) was funding research to enable bat COVID to infect people.  If you haven’t, please read the other letters in my COVID series here and here.  Since the common cold, flu, bronchitis, and other seasonal illnesses have been non-existent, is COVID just anyone who is sick and pops a 45 cycle PCR or is it a real thing…?  At this point I am not sure about anything other than the fact that we are all being mislead and it has to be intentional.

At this point, I honestly don’t know.  What I do know is there are people with political power willfully using COVID as an excuse to strip our rights and our dignity.  All the while, from the very beginning, those who are or should be the most informed, have access to the best most accurate information, and be most aware of the real risks have acted like there is no threat at all.  From Governors who declared the strictest lock down, masking, and safety policies in the nation eating out unmasked non-distanced, sending his kids to unmasked, non-distanced summer camp.  Then, there are the ones who held luncheons for donors, got their hair done, and generally behave like there wasn’t/isn’t a pandemic.  Others hosted large, unmasked birthday parties, while others attended the Met Gala (here, here, her, here, and here). Seriously, there are too many examples to list, and all by people supportive of the most restrictive measures. What do they know? They are clearly not worried at all about COVID, while they continue to endorse fear-porn.  Actions speak louder than words. It is clear they don’t believe the same line politicians and media have been feeding us for almost two years.  Their actions tell us that none of these people believe their own bullshit and are obviously not sucking up the fear-porn they are trying to feed us.  So the question is, why, especially when many of them are in “high risk” groups?  Think about that next time someone wants to see a vax card or asks you to put on a muzzle. I don’t know about you, but I am done with the compliance and the bullshit.