Welcome once again to the Asylum, my dear readers. I know in the past that I have said I don’t think there are hundred-year-old plots for world domination, and I still don’t. I think there are disconnected plans by generations of wealthy people acting in their own interests and often believing they know best for everyone else. That being said, there is a plan coming to fruition long after its architects have fallen. This plan was set in motion over 60 years ago, and it is the driving factor in America’s current leftist problem. It is also one of the primary reasons children are more indoctrinated than educated in most school systems, and neither they nor the instructors can think rationally or critically in most cases.
Our story starts in the 1950s, a time when our education system was local and excellent, our currency was still nominally hard, and the average adult knew there was little difference between Nazis and Communists, but more importantly, they are both bad. It was good times, even if the Cold War was raging. In this period, there was a Senator, Joseph McCarthy, who was very concerned about socialist infiltration of our culture. So, he held investigations, and why wouldn’t you when Stalin and then, more recently (from his perspective), Khrushchev had publicly spoken about infiltrating American culture through entertainment and education? The hearings at times were brutal and did ruin, rightly and wrongly, the reputations and careers of some prominent people.
This led to some fear and backlash (largely incited by political opponents more concerned with discrediting him than the validity of his concerns). This resulted in McCarthyism being a derogatory term for unreasonable interrogation for the next 40 years. Sadly, as we sit here in 2026, it is more than obvious Senator McCarthy was 100% correct, and we are suffering from the fact that he was essentially shut down in the end. We could use some McCarthyism today in a bunch of places and not just for Commies anymore.
The backlash from the Red Scare, coupled with the unpopular war in Vietnam, specifically fought to oppose Communism and for no other reason, made a significant minority of the Baby Boomer generation view communism as favorable and more easily influenced by Communist propaganda. This was followed by the USSR funding much of the anti-war movement and violent groups like the Weather Underground and Black Panthers. This is because, by the 1960s, it was clear to everyone in power in the USSR that they would never come out on top in a battle of economic power with the United States and, as such, could not come out on top in a military conflict with the United States. Almost every large-scale conflict America has ever fought in history has been won by the economic ability to sustain the fight with materiel more than manpower. The outliers are Korea and Vietnam, and those were only because they weren’t legally wars and so were unable to flip the industrial switch that previous wars did. In more recent conflicts, we sort of won while we were there, largely because the technology gap was so wide, but even then, days after our withdrawal, those places were essentially restored to the state they were before we arrived. As a result, the planners in the USSR set in motion a plan to capture our culture from within. This started with the hippies seeking academic positions at universities across the country in a greater percentage than any generation before it. Many of these new professors were the same radicals like Kathy Boudin, Mark Rudd, and Paul Krueger, who were members of Soviet-funded organizations like the Weather Underground, but had also been convicted of felonies, including murders that were politically motivated by their leftist ideologies.
It was in this period of the late ’70s onward we saw the massive push for everyone to get a college education, regardless of actual academic ability. At first, there were legitimate standards, and not everyone could get into college, and even with financial aid programs, there was a barrier to entry. Then, as these same people moved from academics into policy positions, it resulted in the previous federal student loan program, first enacted in response to Sputnik and available specifically for certain science, math, and engineering programs (as a national defense initiative), being overhauled in 1992/93, removing qualification requirements and making them available for literally any field of study, regardless of its viability as an income-generating career.
Shortly after this change occurred, it became apparent to administrators that they were leaving a lot of money on the table. As a result, entrance requirements continued to drop and are still dropping today, with many schools no longer requiring an ACT or SAT as part of the admissions process. As standards dropped, colleges needed new courses of study that degrees could be issued in for people who couldn’t actually get a degree in the old college system (pre–late ’90s/early ’00s). Unfortunately, the Marxist
hippies were now moving into positions of academic power on campuses, and we got a flood of identity studies programs and other soft science (not science) programs as vessels for the new intersectionality model, replacing class with identity. They used this change to deny it was repackaged Marxism, at least at first, until there was enough of it that opposition didn’t matter as much.
Once these courses were in place, it wasn’t hard to incorporate the requirement for at least one of these classes in nearly every degree (we want a well-rounded education, after all). The indoctrination works like this: children 17–21 (new college students, and they are, for the most part, children) who are away from home for the first time and stressed, a little scared, and they play into their emotions, validate their desires (regardless of what they are), and then offer the comfort of an identity that fits neatly into the intersectional matrix (with the requirement you make that position your entire identity) or the ostracism of refusing to tie yourself to an identity. Most of these kids take the identity or, worse, adopt an identity that gets them more status in the system (gay, bi, trans, or whatever). Then they live it for 4–6 years or more.
Now, in the late stages, almost all of the K–12 teachers rolling out of colleges for the last 20 years are the product, to one extent or another, of this indoctrination. This is why we have teachers talking about sexual identity to 5-year-olds, pornography in school libraries, and bigger Pride Week celebrations in elementary schools than for Presidents’ Day, Thanksgiving, or any other normal holiday. The best teacher I ever had was a man by the name of Charles Ice, and the rumor was that he was gay. I don’t know if it was true or not, but I do know he would have rather died than discuss anything that deeply private with a student in any grade. That isn’t the case anymore. We did have a little cultural warning with movies like 1994’s PCU that foreshadowed the total takeover of identity studies on college campuses.
So, what does this accomplish, you might ask? Well, several things: it weakens the family, creates deep social divides that are more emotional than actual ideological (making it impossible to talk them out of), and destroys the victims’ ability to think objectively and critically. The most dangerous thing, however, is that it totally removes even the concept of agency. These children graduate with the idea that they have no control over anything, and life happens to them, fully incorporated into their identity at the deepest levels, reinforced by their place in the intersectional grid, be it the blue-haired land whale groveling apologies due to their privilege or the Black girl who thinks white people shouldn’t speak and that she can’t be racist.
Think about it and then look at the positions they publicly hold. Their push for a living wage (none of them can tell you what that is exactly): they honestly believe they have no control over their wages and that it is impossible to earn your way into a salary that could support a comfortable life. When presented with suggestions about improving their skills, improving their work ethic (The majority talk openly about slacking or quiet quitting, then wonder why they get passed over for raises and promotions.), moving to a place with a lower cost of living, or any other course of action that requires agency and them taking charge of their lives, you are not met with an argument or reason. The typical response is to decide you are some kind of -ist, bootlicker, or other childish name (these people love their labels). The same dynamic applies to any issue from student loans to pregnancy/abortion, and their arguments always boil down to it isn’t their fault they are powerless to affect the outcome of their own lives because things just happen to them because they are victims, and the intersectionality matrix not only classifies but justifies their victimhood. Their motto should be ‘Its not my fault.’
This mindset is further illustrated by this subset’s reaction to illegal immigrants and any criminal. Since the idea of agency and responsibility is anathema to these people, they truly don’t believe anyone has it. When you understand that they truly believe that the illegals and criminals are not responsible for their actions because choice and agency don’t really exist, it becomes much easier to understand their positions and how they could be so wrong. Another side effect of this ideology is that since things just happen to people no matter what, culture becomes valuable only to the point that it has a place in the intersectionality matrix, and in that respect, they are all valid and equal. The last key element of this new and rebranded Marxism is that since you don’t actually have control, the only way to evaluate anything is: does it make me good, bad, or neutral right now? There is little or no value placed on possible future effects or consequences; whatever is going to happen will happen.
Sadly, as we have seen with the often violent protests (riots), theft mobs, and other civil unrest, those who have no agency are willing to do anything for those who promise to take care of them. That is exactly how Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York: he was a test case—can we capture major civic centers with empty promises? This isn’t super new, but it is different this time because it isn’t just the usual political corruption. Since the fall of the USSR, many of the Muslim non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have seen and taken advantage of the framework the KGB laid out 60 years ago. This Red-Green alliance is a pattern we have seen before in the Middle East and are seeing the next stages of all across Europe now.
I don’t know how to stop it, but if we don’t, these poor misguided children are in for a rude awakening when they are hung or stoned for their identity and our children and grandchildren live in the American Caliphate. Regardless of your faith or political leaning, if you believe in personal accountability, oppose pedophilia, and don’t want our nation to fall from the inside, then you must resist the intersectional movement and anything Islam. I had some hopes for Trump, but he isn’t the answer. He talks too much and thinks too little. He is still obviously far too easily swayed on things that matter, as shown by his abandonment of DOGE, his falling out with Massie (one of the best people in D.C.), his failure to prosecute the Epstein files, his failure to totally withdraw from the UN and NATO, among other things. While he may not have been successful, he didn’t even try. Largely, he has been a mixed bag, and his recent blasphemy doesn’t help his case. We don’t need a mixed bag; we need an adult who will draw a hard line and hold it, period. Who is that? I don’t know, but I do know if each of us personally does it, we can slow it down. We got here in increments, and the only way back is in increments, one step at a time.
Hebrews 13:7-9
7 Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith. 8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. 9 Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them.
God bless you
-Sam
Links
https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/how-marxist-left-captured-higher-education
https://www.britannica.com/event/McCarthyism
https://doczz.net/doc/3653392/the-obama-timeline
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/96231
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/19427786231192956
https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/the-uprising-families-clash-schools-over-lgbtq-propaganda
https://sproutsocial.com/insights/quiet-quitting/
https://www.meforum.org/europes-red-green-alliance
https://www.jns.org/islamists-and-progressives-form-a-red-green-alliance-against-the-individual/
https://www.iwp.edu/papers-studies/2007/04/06/islamism-and-stratagem/