COVID and the LIES
So here in 2021 the difference between a conspiracy theory and indisputable fact is what three to six months. In this letter I will lay down some uncomfortable truths about COVID and where certain “Leaders” would like to take us as a result of COVID. Let’s start with everyone’s favorite liar and sole source of truth, shall we?
Dr. Anthony Fauci perjured himself on multiple occasions. On July 20, 2021 during a Senate hearing on COVID when asked about gain of function research being funded through a third party by the NIH he vehemently denied it to the point where he called Senator Paul a liar for bringing it up. Senator Rand Paul was pointing out that as it looks more and more like the COVID virus did escape from the lab in Wuhan anyone who was funding that research would bear some culpability for all that has happened since. In the Senate during the hearing Fauci poo pooed that as just conspiracy theory talk and vehemently denied that any gain of function research was done through a third party or otherwise with US funds.
Let’s fast forward to the FOI (Freedom of Information Request) filed by the Intercept. This request recovered hundreds of documents including these (here and here) that clearly show not only that the NIH was in fact funding such research, but also why they felt the research was important page 15 of the Understanding-Risk-Bat-Coronavirus-Emergence-Grant-Notice states:
“Most emerging human viruses come from wildlife, and these represent a significant threat to global public health and biosecurity - as demonstrated by the SARS coronavirus pandemic of 2002-03 and an ongoing SARS-like epidemic in the Middle East. This project seeks to understand what factors allow animal Coronaviruses to evolve and jump into the human population by studying virus diversity in a critical group of animals (bats), at sites of high risk for emergence (wildlife markets) in an emerging disease hotspot (China).”
That is a direct quote from the grant form… Have we heard the bones of that story fleshed out before? I find it interesting in 2020 anyone saying this virus escaped a lab was a tinfoil hat nutjob that the story accepted as fact would have been published in a grant request from 2014. Then to prove COVID was a natural occurrence those who try to control the information use a letter by Peter Daszak (yes, the guy from the gain of function COVID grants) as proof to debunk the “conspiracy” theory that COVID had escaped from the Wuhan lab. Seriously the Lancet a supposed authority and trusted source for scientific truth published a letter from Peter all about how there was no possible way the COVID virus ever escaped from a Lab that everyone jumped on.
The interesting thing is that Gain of function research was banned in America starting in 2014. These bans were lifted in 2017 (here). Immediately after the NIH could no longer directly fund gain of function research here comes EcoHealth Alliance headed by Peter Daszak that launder money into this type of forbidden research in China where there are very few rules and less concern for moral hazard or human decency.
So here we are in 2021 closing in on two years of pandemic nightmare and it is becoming more clear that the guy we have collectively put in charge of our pandemic response Fauci is probably culpable for the pandemic, and as such has a vested interest in misleading us in nearly every aspect of pandemic response. Fauci seems more interested in covering his tracks than in actual public health. Dr. Fauci is so desperate to hide the truth that he risks a federal felony and lied under oath (here). We are in a place where more and more lies are being exposed yet the mainstream media is silent and still supporting a crumbling narrative. Why, why would anyone when lives are at risk still refuse to entertain any idea counter to the narrative pushed by proven liars? What other motivations could those making decisions have?
Tin foil hat time
Please ensure your tinfoil hat is affixed firmly to your head as we proceed. Well for now at least, all this may be considered fact in a few months at the current rate. Let’s ask some questions, shall we? What if certain entrenched non-elected forces decided to use this Pandemic as their end game? What if the intention was to use the Pandemic and fear of the Pandemic to fully seize total control creating a two-tiered society where the lower class works and obeys like modern-day surfs and the elite class live like nobles and royalty. Note Klaus Schwab head of World Economic Forum said “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy” and has espoused a communist\fascist takeover of the economies saying ““The Great Reset will require us to integrate all stakeholders of global society into a community of common interest, purpose and action” (here, here, and here). They have been working towards this for almost a century (that will be another letter), but I think they miscalculated and the people were not yet globally docile enough. Sure it is working in some places look at Australia and New Zealand for example (here, here, here, and here). The problem is they didn’t get everyone in America you have everything from no restrictions in South Dakota (here) leaving people and businesses to do what they think is best for themselves and then places like California who have gone full police state similar to the fascists down under (here). Then there are the massive protests across Europe as people resists government attempts to restrict their freedom (here, here, and here). The worst part is everywhere that has gone full control freak and tried to lock down the peasants the ruling class in preparation for their ascendance has acted like it didn’t apply to them we have seen Nancy and Lightfoot get their hair done against their own rules (here), Lightfoot in Chicago going so far as to defend it because she is special (here), Newsom and Breed in California eating out (here), and the list goes on from sports officials in the UK (here), to Obama’s birthday (here), on and on. COVID doesn’t affect the ruling class it seems. Also if COVID is so deadly that it warrants all the fear porn, destruction of small businesses, and forced vaccination (it is coming) why are the elite clearly not concerned? What do they know that we do not? Back to the very incriminating FOI about Fauci. What if this information was released without being redacted to useless just to create a scapegoat and way to back out after more than 20 months of driving total mania? Just follow me a moment while the Biden administration has promised national action (here) (most likely unconstitutional action that will be resisted or ignored at the state level) going forward after Afghanistan the administration has little credibility left to it and it probably won’t work. Now they have set the stage to exit it was all Anthony “A lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science.” Fauci’s (here)fault. In his effort to cover up his culpability he miss lead us all…. Enter back track here because it wasn’t their fault. Then before he is tried or has the ability to testify some mad gunman who lost a loved one shoots him dead or he didn’t hag himself on suicide watch in prison. Thus the entire mess is tied up nicely with all the leads or possibility of finding the truth buried with him….. I may be off base or I may be a prophet 3 to 6 months will tell.
Masks and Bullshit
It seems everyone is going mask crazy again. I get that there is a lot of fear and that the media has hyped the virus to insane levels for what I believe to be political rather than safety reasons. They have gone so far as to do dramatic series on their staff battling COVID that never in fact had it, they used images of Italian hospitals and claiming them to be New Your City (here), and numerous other instances of journalistic fraud for the sake of the narrative of fear. First it was to weeks to flatten the curve, then it was a month, then two, and now it is lock down and masks because science… Except for all the really good science I can find randomized and controlled studies done since 2009 all show masks don’t work at all for viruses and masks present health risks of their own.
This study to compare cloth masks to surgical masks found that cloth masks passed 97% of all reparatory particulate and increased the chances the user of a cloth mask would contract viral illness.
2015: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
These studies found no difference in viral transmission rates between N.95, surgical masks, and Control groups.
2016: https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
2017: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
2019: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
2020: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
Note these are randomized controlled studies looking into viral transmission rates in an attempt to keep healthcare workers safer and they found no significant difference in the prevention of viral transmission except in the case of cloth masks that seemed to increase the risk of infection. Further if medical masks do prevent the spread of viruses (if they do or not is completely unclear in the research) guidance is still not to use any mask more than once and to then replace it, and studies done on the effectiveness of surgical masks show that after 4 hours they significantly lose effectiveness.
See here:
https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000300003
Dr Fauci’s own emails stated that masks don’t work to stop viruses (here). The only science I can find in support of Masks can be seen here it is not a blind scientific study, but following of 10 Chinese households. Since there was no control I am not sure how they can with a straight face claim efficiency over not masking, and it is interesting that one non-controlled study with deviant results should dictate policy. Unfortunately, policy decisions are being made on what amounts at most to anecdotal evidence that is contrary to the findings of actual controlled and randomized research. It also appears there may be a degree of political pressure as well (here, here, and here). While interesting correlation is not causation. I think a lot of the findings in the “study” rely on correlation being causation especially since it is careful to say that they don't know why it works but they kind of think it does. This is dangerous thinking since controlled studies clearly show wearing a cloth mask is more dangerous than not having any mask at all and surgical masks become significantly more dangerous after just a four-hour period of wear.
In light of the fact that initial recommendation not to mask actually followed the available science and the subsequent flipflopping on the issue this really feels like government officials trying to look like they are doing something and also giving people something to do to reinforce a false sense of security. Unfortunately, the science says plain cloth masks at all and surgical masks not discarded and replaced after four hours at most in a surgically clean environment create a greater hazard for becoming infected. So you need to ask yourself why?
There are some questions here especially in light of Senior FDA staff resigning over political pressure (here)[This will be covered in a future letter].
1. Why are medical decisions being driven by politics not science?
2. Since political goals are not health goals what is driving the political pressure?
3. Why are the CDC and the FDA ignoring the science behind masking?
4. How much of the contradictory and confusing guidance coming from Fauci and the NIH were intentionally meant to cover up their culpability in the COVID pandemic?
I am sure there are more but these strike me at least as the most interesting and telling at the moment.